Under what circumstances is physical restraint deemed appropriate?

Physical restraint is considered appropriate primarily when an individual poses an immediate threat to safety. This situation typically involves circumstances where there is an imminent risk of harm to either the individual in question or others around them. The primary goal of using physical restraint in these cases is to de-escalate a potentially dangerous situation and prevent injury.

When assessing whether to apply physical restraint, security personnel must weigh the necessity and the level of threat presented. Immediate threats can arise from aggressive behaviors or situations where an individual might harm themselves or others. This reflects the fundamental principle of safety and protection, which is central to the role of security officers.

In contrast, scenarios involving verbal aggression, suspicious behavior, or adherence to standard procedures may not warrant physical restraint on their own, as they do not necessarily indicate an immediate threat to safety. Effective security practices emphasize the use of communication and de-escalation techniques in less threatening situations, reserving physical restraint for the most urgent and dangerous scenarios.